Bristol Neighbourhood Demand Profile
A like-for-like comparison of forward calendar pressure across eleven Bristol neighbourhood groups, with small samples suppressed.
listings in the citywide sample
Within ten kilometres of central Bristol
neighbourhood groups published
One small area suppressed
citywide next-30 unavailable share
Latest qualifying calendar state
top-to-bottom 90-day spread
71% in Easton and Greenbank; 31% in Totterdown and Knowle
Principal findings
What the evidence shows
The strongest result has the smallest published sample.
Easton and Greenbank leads on the 90-day measure at 71%, but its sample is nineteen. The result is published with that context rather than treated as a precise city ranking.
Local spread is materially wider than the city headline.
The 40-point range between the highest and lowest qualifying groups shows why a single Bristol average cannot describe every local market.
Near-term and 90-day measures do not always rank areas identically.
Bishopston and Gloucester Road reaches 67% in the next 30 nights but 56% over 90, showing the importance of specifying the forward window.
Figure 1
Forward pressure across Bristol neighbourhood groups
Next-90-night unavailable share, ranked from highest to lowest. Sample sizes appear beside each result.
Reading note. Neighbourhood groups are collection areas, not official statistical boundaries. The citywide row also contains listings outside these named groups.
Table 1
Published neighbourhood observations
All qualifying groups in the July release, with three forward measures and the retained listing sample.
| Area | Listings | Next 30 nights | Next 90 nights | August 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Easton & Greenbank | 19 | 74% | 71% | 75% |
| Clifton & the Village | 59 | 71% | 65% | 71% |
| Harbourside & City Centre | 102 | 67% | 63% | 64% |
| Redland & Cotham | 60 | 58% | 57% | 59% |
| Bishopston & Gloucester Road | 44 | 67% | 56% | 64% |
| Southville & Bedminster | 32 | 53% | 51% | 50% |
| Montpelier & St Pauls | 58 | 54% | 46% | 49% |
| Hotwells & Cliftonwood | 29 | 53% | 46% | 52% |
| Old Market & St Philips | 43 | 48% | 45% | 45% |
| Westbury & Henleaze | 31 | 43% | 35% | 42% |
| Totterdown & Knowle | 33 | 44% | 31% | 38% |
| All Bristol (10km) | 720 | 56% | 49% | 53% |
Table note. A listing must have at least 30 observed nights in the window. Named groups with fewer than ten listings are suppressed.
Method
How this output was produced
- Start with listings within ten kilometres of central Bristol and retain the latest qualifying state for each listing-night.
- Assign each listing once to its nearest named area centre when it falls within 1.6 kilometres.
- Require at least 30 observed nights per listing and suppress area samples below ten.
- Report the citywide ten-kilometre result separately from the named-area subset.
Interpretation boundary
What this release cannot prove
- Named groups are practical market areas rather than administrative neighbourhood boundaries.
- Smaller published samples carry greater sampling uncertainty.
- Unavailable calendar share is a demand signal, not a verified occupancy rate.
Source register
Evidence and citation
Upgraded Intelligence (2026), Bristol Neighbourhood Demand Profile, UI-BRF-BRI-2026-02.
Questions, corrections or requests for an accessible extract can be sent to hello@theupgradeauthority.co.uk.