Property evidence briefing
What changed in
UK property evidence.
What changed in the published evidence, which areas can be compared and where the data remains limited.
dated market states
+1,570,931 since the comparison release.
records on the public map
+104 since the previous comparable release.
comparison-ready areas
Of 361 local authorities tested against the same gate.
releases before trend monitoring
2 approved releases support comparison, not a market trend claim.
Series maturity
What this series can show.
Only releases using the same method count towards the six editions required before monitoring trends.
2 approved releases support comparison, not a market trend claim.
Evidence system change
What genuinely changed.
The crawler retained 1.57m additional dated states while the mapped current cross-section moved by only +104 records. That is evidence accumulation, not the creation of 1.57m new homes.
The share of the fixed national collection grid completed in the current release.
2,199 fixed cells changed their current-record total.
Net change after 104 records of national movement.
Growth in retained dated observations across the evidence estate.
Comparable local readings
Only the areas
that clear the gate.
An area is comparison-ready only when both releases are at least 90% complete, completion shifts by no more than 5 percentage points and the baseline contains at least 20 allocated records. Movement below remains movement in aggregate current records—not a verified change in homes, demand or achieved rent.
| Local authority | Region | Previous | Current | Movement | Completion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melton | East Midlands | 59 | 43 | -16 · -27.1% | 100% → 100% |
| South Holland | East Midlands | 55 | 41 | -14 · -25.4% | 100% → 100% |
| East Staffordshire | West Midlands | 110 | 84 | -26 · -23.6% | 97% → 98% |
| Cannock Chase | West Midlands | 22 | 17 | -5 · -22.7% | 100% → 100% |
| Bassetlaw | East Midlands | 81 | 64 | -17 · -21.0% | 100% → 100% |
| Lichfield | West Midlands | 69 | 55 | -14 · -20.3% | 100% → 100% |
| South Lanarkshire | Scotland | 171 | 137 | -34 · -19.9% | 100% → 100% |
| East Hampshire | South East | 127 | 102 | -25 · -19.7% | 100% → 100% |
Reading note. The table shows the largest absolute movements among the 60 areas that passed the gate. 301 areas were withheld from movement ranking in this edition.
Download all briefing dataCoverage maturation
A better reading
is not a market rise.
These areas gained the most completion between releases. Their current values are useful as a new evidence baseline, but the release-to-release record change is not ranked as a market signal.
- 01HackneyLondon0% → 100%
- 02Tower HamletsLondon0% → 100%
- 03SouthwarkLondon0% → 100%
- 04IslingtonLondon0% → 100%
- 05NewhamLondon0% → 100%
- 06TorbaySouth West0% → 100%
- 07Waltham ForestLondon0% → 100%
- 08LambethLondon0% → 100%
Regional quality ledger
Coverage before
comparison.
Regional totals are shown to expose the strength of the release, not to manufacture a league table. A region with few gated areas should not be interpreted as a clean regional movement.
| Region | Authorities | Comparable | Comparable share | Current records | Mean completion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| East Midlands | 35 | 9 | 25.7% | 4,681 | 94.4% |
| East of England | 45 | 11 | 24.4% | 7,244 | 98.6% |
| England | 2 | 0 | 0% | 246 | 100% |
| London | 32 | 0 | 0% | 14,541 | 83.6% |
| North East | 12 | 1 | 8.3% | 2,811 | 100% |
| North West | 35 | 5 | 14.3% | 8,109 | 92.3% |
| Northern Ireland | 11 | 7 | 63.6% | 2,528 | 100% |
| Scotland | 32 | 13 | 40.6% | 10,241 | 99.9% |
| South East | 64 | 4 | 6.3% | 11,697 | 98.6% |
| South West | 26 | 1 | 3.8% | 17,881 | 94.1% |
| Wales | 22 | 3 | 13.6% | 8,452 | 98.3% |
| West Midlands | 30 | 5 | 16.7% | 4,605 | 97.6% |
| Yorkshire and The Humber | 15 | 1 | 6.7% | 6,421 | 90.6% |
UK area lens
Local context,
kept separate.
One authority from each UK nation shows how official rent and price evidence sits beside the observation layer. Measures remain unavailable where comparable local evidence is missing.
average monthly rent (June 2026) · 6.4% annual growth
- Sale price (May 2026)
- £288,513
- Gross yield proxy
- 3.3%
- Observation completion
- 100% → 100%
average monthly rent · growth unavailable
- Sale price (May 2026)
- £181,586
- Gross yield proxy
- Not available
- Observation completion
- 100% → 100%
average monthly rent · growth unavailable
- Sale price (May 2026)
- £189,542
- Gross yield proxy
- Not available
- Observation completion
- 100% → 100%
average monthly rent (June 2026) · 4.5% annual growth
- Sale price (May 2026)
- £224,622
- Gross yield proxy
- 4.5%
- Observation completion
- 97% → 98%
Figures above belong to this edition. Area profiles show the latest available evidence. Yield is an area proxy, not a return for an individual property.
Interpretation boundary
What this edition
cannot prove.
- 01
Two approved releases establish a comparison, not a market trend. The series requires at least six consistent releases before repeated direction is described as trend monitoring.
- 02
Current record representations are not counts of unique homes, bookings, tenancies or complete local market inventory.
- 03
Local movement can reflect collection, geolocation and identity evidence as well as changes in the current market cross-section.
- 04
Long-let rent, growth, sale-price and yield measures use their separately stated official evidence periods and are not inferred from the observation layer.
Files and citation
Inspect the edition.
The briefing is a view over versioned releases. Its supporting JSON remains available after the latest alias moves on.
Upgraded Intelligence (2026), UK Property Evidence Briefing: 20 August 2026, UI-BRF-2026-08-20.